Peterborough ON - Last evening I was invited to a social at the Gathering Place (Enweying) in the Native Peoples House of Learning, Gzowski College, Trent University, to meet with a group of ten young people and their four adult leaders from N'Amerind Friendship Centre in London, Ontario. They were visiting historic Aboriginal sites in the area and listening to area Ojibwe teachers. There were close to 50 people present, and it was a pleasure to be with the visitors, and our Thursday evening Ojibwe teacher, Liz Osawamick, and some members of the class including Raven, and Josh, one of the drummers.
Some of the London young people attend the Sweetgrass School in London, and some of them come from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Temagami, and northern Ontario. I met Rachel Hearns, niece of Sam and Patricia Hearns, of London; and Eldon French, who knows the dear people of Chippewa of the Thames First Nation with whom I worked for so many years: Elder Mary Sturgeon, who taught me Ojibwe; Marcie French; Maxine Hendrick; Leona Hendrick; and their families; briinging back for me so many memories of so many years of my life in London, Thedford, and Oldcaste (near Windsor).
Another of the adults in the group was Robin Miller, and her mother, Elizabeth Jacks, and I worked together with Mary Rose Bearfoot Jones and so many others 30 years ago with WCISNIC (Windsor Committee in Support of Native Indian Concerns) during the time of the E.C.Row Expressway burial site issue. After two years, we did not find a burial site, but the effort to lobby the Ontario government on that issue resulted in a change to the Cemeteries Act during the Bill Davis Conservative government era so that when bones are discovered, it is now mandatory for the excavating to halt, and the nearest First Nations Chief and Council must be consulted, before work can continue.
In that regard, imagine my horror to read recently in the Peterborough Examiner, copied from the Orillia Packet & Times, that the city of Orillia is built on an ancient Aboriginal burial site, replete with photos of skulls and leg bones piled up along a fence. Gloria Taylor, curator of the Orillia Museum of Art and History, told Sun Media reporter Colin McKim "the old photograph of 20 aboriginal skulls lined up on a board fence is a grim reminder of a less enlightened time. It was a freak show. It hurts your heart to think that people's remains were treated with such disrespect. How would you feel if that was your grandmother's grave and you saw her head sitting on a board?" The nearby Rama First Nation has been notified, and is currently considering how to proceed with this issue, known to archaeologists as the "Slavin site".
Of special interest to me is the fact that local residents in and around that Slavin site have known of this situation for generations but no one seems to have understood its significance to Aboriginal people. To me, it explains why we have so much educational work to do to help Canadian citizens understand the facts concerning our relationship with the First Peoples.
It tells me that we must begin to build new bridges of respect for the treaties we signed with sovereign nations.
And it convinces me that with Prime Minister Harper's apology for the residential schools and the injustices faced by thousands of children who spent time in them, or who never returned, our responsibility for saying "sorry" has only just begun.
To read the Orillia Packet & Times story, see
scan0001- Orillia Burial Site - p. 1
scan0002 - Orillia Burial Site p. 2
scan0003 - Orillia Burial Site - P. 3
(end)
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Friday, November 7, 2008
What does reconciliation mean to you?
"What does reconciliation mean to you?"
Chief Ovide Mercredi, of the Misipawistick Cree Nation, was addressing the Conference on Reconciliation Processes, held last June at Queen's University by its School of Policy Studies and the First Nations Technical Institute (FNTI).
"We've been together for over 500 years and we are just now beginning to talk about reconciliation. When do we stop talking about it and start doing it?" he asked.
Chief Mercredi was challenging his audience to think about the relationship between the First Peoples of Turtle Island, and the rest of us, from the time of first contact when explorers found these shores and entered into trade with sovereign nations who had survived in this territory for thousands of years, who formed alliances and lived side by side in reasonable harmony, through the creation of the colonial governments of Upper and Lower Canada, to the eventual establishment of a country called Canada.
As we became more numerous, we took over more land, forcing the First Peoples to live in territories called reserves, and with their lives managed by legislation called the Indian Act.
The Canadian government treated them as wards of the Crown, and took their children into residential schools where they were subjected to the ultimate in assimilation: removed as young children from their families, forbidden to speak their language or tell their stories, and subject to hunger, physical and sexual abuse, farm labour and household chores, poor food, inadequate clothing and exposure to communicable diseases.
In the mid-1990's, the government set up a Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) which produced over 400 recommendations, most of which still have to be considered, and implemented.
In this new century, there has been an Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRRSSA) signed among the church entities who ran the schools, the federal government who funded them, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), and representatives of residential school survivors across the country. A part of that settlement was the creation of a Truth & Reconciliation Commission, which was to begin work this year but ran into problems and fell apart. It now awaits reorganization, with the hope that the work can be resumed soon - before more and more survivors depart this earth without having had the chance to share their stories. And those stories may come also from the people who worked in the schools, and from survivors who remember good times which helped them to live responsibly as adults.
All of this has happened throughout the past 500 years. Reconciliation was possible at any point along the way, but it is only now that we are hearing that word, and in fact, we have been legislated into achieving that.
Some have mentioned the possibility of simply forgetting about all that has gone before, and just beginning to live in the present moment. That may work for some people in their personal lives, but it may not be possible in our corporate life in Canada.
Rather, I think we are being called to go back and do it over. In one of the videos on residential schools produced by Anglican Video, the late Rev. Ernest Willie tells us:
"If I was talking to Jesus today, I would have to say: "Sir, you have to come back and do it over. They didn't get it.'"
And I think that applies to us. We have to do it over - go back to the beginning and try to build right relationships from the time of first contact.
What would have happened if explorers, and then settlers, had come to the shores of Turtle Island, and had begun by listening to the people they found here?
If, instead of presuming that the only message to be listened to was the one they brought, they had realized that the people they met would also have a message to share?
If, as we began to sign treaties, we had listened to the terms of the treaties as the First Peoples understood them?
If, when we realized that Indigenous children needed education, and in fact Chief Shingwauk and other leaders had asked the government to help them educate their children, we had listened to understand exactly what kind of education they wanted their children to have?
If, after all the time, energy and money that went into producing the RCAP report, we had begun to act on its recommendations?
Would we now be in a place of at least working towards reconciliation?
Well, of course, I know we can't go back and re-live 500 years. But we can begin to listen to the stories the First Peoples tell of those years, to begin to comprehend how they saw their part in that relationship. We can begin to try to listen with understanding and compassion.
This is the way I think the Truth & Reconciliation Commission should be guiding us - but of course guidance won't come until they have figured some of that out for themselves.
Meanwhile, there are small groups across the country who are beginning to sit down together to test out this idea of holding truth and reconciliation gatherings within our own commuinities. Groups of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who are trying to listen to one another - doing the kind of listening that was missed five centuries ago. But that is not easy. It's amazing how many of us need to be listened to - who want to be the first to talk.
So who is to go first? Who, in the circle, will undertake to listen, while someone else begins to speak?
I suggest the one who has been waiting for 500 years to have the chance to speak - and to be listened to - that is the one who should go first. In most circles, that will be the Indigenous person.
After 500 years, it is their turn.
Do we have the time, the courage, the energy, simply to be present and to listen to Aboriginal brothers and sisters?
The future of our relationship within Canada rests on our answer to that question.
Chief Ovide Mercredi, of the Misipawistick Cree Nation, was addressing the Conference on Reconciliation Processes, held last June at Queen's University by its School of Policy Studies and the First Nations Technical Institute (FNTI).
"We've been together for over 500 years and we are just now beginning to talk about reconciliation. When do we stop talking about it and start doing it?" he asked.
Chief Mercredi was challenging his audience to think about the relationship between the First Peoples of Turtle Island, and the rest of us, from the time of first contact when explorers found these shores and entered into trade with sovereign nations who had survived in this territory for thousands of years, who formed alliances and lived side by side in reasonable harmony, through the creation of the colonial governments of Upper and Lower Canada, to the eventual establishment of a country called Canada.
As we became more numerous, we took over more land, forcing the First Peoples to live in territories called reserves, and with their lives managed by legislation called the Indian Act.
The Canadian government treated them as wards of the Crown, and took their children into residential schools where they were subjected to the ultimate in assimilation: removed as young children from their families, forbidden to speak their language or tell their stories, and subject to hunger, physical and sexual abuse, farm labour and household chores, poor food, inadequate clothing and exposure to communicable diseases.
In the mid-1990's, the government set up a Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) which produced over 400 recommendations, most of which still have to be considered, and implemented.
In this new century, there has been an Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRRSSA) signed among the church entities who ran the schools, the federal government who funded them, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), and representatives of residential school survivors across the country. A part of that settlement was the creation of a Truth & Reconciliation Commission, which was to begin work this year but ran into problems and fell apart. It now awaits reorganization, with the hope that the work can be resumed soon - before more and more survivors depart this earth without having had the chance to share their stories. And those stories may come also from the people who worked in the schools, and from survivors who remember good times which helped them to live responsibly as adults.
All of this has happened throughout the past 500 years. Reconciliation was possible at any point along the way, but it is only now that we are hearing that word, and in fact, we have been legislated into achieving that.
Some have mentioned the possibility of simply forgetting about all that has gone before, and just beginning to live in the present moment. That may work for some people in their personal lives, but it may not be possible in our corporate life in Canada.
Rather, I think we are being called to go back and do it over. In one of the videos on residential schools produced by Anglican Video, the late Rev. Ernest Willie tells us:
"If I was talking to Jesus today, I would have to say: "Sir, you have to come back and do it over. They didn't get it.'"
And I think that applies to us. We have to do it over - go back to the beginning and try to build right relationships from the time of first contact.
What would have happened if explorers, and then settlers, had come to the shores of Turtle Island, and had begun by listening to the people they found here?
If, instead of presuming that the only message to be listened to was the one they brought, they had realized that the people they met would also have a message to share?
If, as we began to sign treaties, we had listened to the terms of the treaties as the First Peoples understood them?
If, when we realized that Indigenous children needed education, and in fact Chief Shingwauk and other leaders had asked the government to help them educate their children, we had listened to understand exactly what kind of education they wanted their children to have?
If, after all the time, energy and money that went into producing the RCAP report, we had begun to act on its recommendations?
Would we now be in a place of at least working towards reconciliation?
Well, of course, I know we can't go back and re-live 500 years. But we can begin to listen to the stories the First Peoples tell of those years, to begin to comprehend how they saw their part in that relationship. We can begin to try to listen with understanding and compassion.
This is the way I think the Truth & Reconciliation Commission should be guiding us - but of course guidance won't come until they have figured some of that out for themselves.
Meanwhile, there are small groups across the country who are beginning to sit down together to test out this idea of holding truth and reconciliation gatherings within our own commuinities. Groups of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who are trying to listen to one another - doing the kind of listening that was missed five centuries ago. But that is not easy. It's amazing how many of us need to be listened to - who want to be the first to talk.
So who is to go first? Who, in the circle, will undertake to listen, while someone else begins to speak?
I suggest the one who has been waiting for 500 years to have the chance to speak - and to be listened to - that is the one who should go first. In most circles, that will be the Indigenous person.
After 500 years, it is their turn.
Do we have the time, the courage, the energy, simply to be present and to listen to Aboriginal brothers and sisters?
The future of our relationship within Canada rests on our answer to that question.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)